CRank: 5Score: 33540

It's true, it WAS in the public beta

6237d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Graphics don't make the game.

Graphics, gameplay, music, replay value, fun factor, lasting appeal, and story TOGETHER are what make the game

6237d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Is that these price cuts aren't just "pulled out of the blue". SOMETHING happens to make a price cut possible.

For example, the first time the price was dropped they took out some of the usb ports of the ps3 along with backward capability.

The second price cut came from when they refined the Blu Laser.

And with Blu Ray becoming less expensive to produce, yes a new price cut is gonna come eventually.

Also, they will break even even...

6238d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Just like MS desperately needed that Mass price cut worldwide in October 2008 because Sony was outselling them right?

6238d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

There wasn't going to be a subscription fee. Just Microtransactions like HOME and the Agency.

I could be wrong though

6238d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I agree with you completely. People act as if an "insider" was needed for something that was basically common sense to begin with.

6239d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I like my 360. But slowly my ps3 has won me over and has had a firm grip on my gaming habit for the past year ever since. And who knows, maybe it is something about the trophies that does it.

6239d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Most of us knew this would probably happen anyway. Just like with Eternal Sonata. But now because everyone knows it's old, they won't get as many sales as they could have if they had brought it out on the same date as the 360 version. Namco needs to wise up (as does Square Enix) plain and simple

6239d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Everyone's free only for the first year only. They give you an extension if you have the RROD. And MS is only "courteous" because of the RROD becoming public. When they were DENYING the RROD even existed, they weren't so "nice". I won't tell my story because anyone can sit here and say "I called so and so" and crap like that. But don't fool yourself into thinking MS has courtesy in mind

6239d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

How can you compare 300 consoles that need repair to a over 60% failure rate?

And to make matters worse, 300 consoles can easily be mistaken as a bad batch of systems. MS on the other hand KNEW of their faulty product and STILL shipped them out. And at over 60% in failures, we're talking MILLIONS of defective systems, not 300.

So you guys can go and "fanboy it up" all you want. Just don't let it block common sense

6239d ago 3 agree1 disagreeView comment

Back in October

6239d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

So? What's your point?

They still beat their main competitor at the time didn't they? (Meaning Sega). So regardless of whatever sales numbers you claim, they were good enough to be number 1

6240d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

To be fair, that was Nintendo's "turf" long before Sony even entered the gaming business

6241d ago 3 agree0 disagreeView comment

It says cgreviews, but they ONLY have a killzone 2 "review". Nothing else. No links to other reviews. No links in general. It's not even a site. It's more like a simple web page. Seems fake to me. And it has misinformation in it as well. Like what's this stuff about install times? The game doesn't even have install times. And at least he/she could have used their own pics like any other reviewer does.

6242d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Thank you for the VERY detailed assistance.

It looks like Rock Band might be the better choice. That is so greedy to make new music games like that and you can't even port over songs from your older versions. So because of that, Rock Band looks to be the better choice.

Again, thanks very much

6242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That still doesn't answer the question

Graphics are intangible. You can't "touch" graphics. If anything most art (notice I said most) are tangible. You can touch a painting. You can touch a sculpture. You can't "touch" music.

But I'll give you bubbles because you did explain the difference between graphics and art. But even though, "better graphics" are still a matter of opinion because what looks "better" is dependent on what ...

6242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

And people are "debating" which looks better, then it's all about opinion.

And correct me if I'm wrong, but graphics are considered a form of art too are they not?

What makes graphics "tangible" and art "intangible"? I'm interested in hearing your explanation for that

6242d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

Does the download content from guitar hero or rock band 1 work with guitar hero and rock band 2?

Because if it does then what is the point of having new version come out every year? I only ask because my nephew wants one of them for his birthday

6242d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

That name you have WILL spark lots of trouble. No question

6243d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

It just means they have a different opinion than yours. What is naive is when people consider others naive on matters of opinion.

6243d ago 7 agree5 disagreeView comment